I would like to use the Excel import to update taxonomic information for Specimen/Observation records. I have filled in the Taxonomic Name (GUID) column and deleted values in the Taxonomic Name (TID) column. However, when I import the excel file, I receive the message "There are no new nodes". While this statement is correct (I did not add any additional specimens), the taxonomic information was not altered. Should it be possible to update field values in this manner? If not, is the only bulk update option to download the import file, delete all the specimen/observation nodes, then re-import the updated any information? This seems undesireable, as media links might be broken when specimens are deleted...
Column width when changed by user is not retained, in the view mode or in the edit mode when the matrix is refreshed or reloaded.
Many specimen record geographical coordinates are entered with relevant uncertainty levels. This is captured in the corresponding field in the specimen/observation content type.
It would be great if we could visualise this uncertainty as a circle around the specimen point using the google.maps.Circle function.
I have added three new taxa on my taxonomy but they appear just under the firts term.
I have tried to place them manually at their right place (txaonomic terms are ordered alphabetically) but they returns each time to their wrong place when I view them in user view.
The three wrongly placed terms are ficobolus, plesiopsenobolus, and sabinita in taxonomy of Doryctinae
Please could you fix that?
Is it possible to have a tool allowing an alphabetical sorting of the main term of a taxonomy ? This could be helpfull.
Thank youfor your help!
As part of the development of the NHM Hypericum site (http://hypericum.myspecies.info) we are trying to establish the best way to use a standardised way of registering chemical compounds.
The chEBI database and ontology of Chemical Entities of Biological Interest seems to provide a very good way of capturing chemical data in a Scratchpad.
Please investigate the best way of integrating this dataset (maybe in the context of the vocabulary integration module?)